Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0383820120720060467
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
2012 Volume.72 No. 6 p.467 ~ p.474
Validity and Reliability of CAT and Dyspnea-12 in Bronchiectasis and Tuberculous Destroyed Lung
Lee Bo-Young

Lee Seo-Hyun
Lee Jae-Seung
Song Jin-Woo
Lee Sang-Do
Jang Seung-Hun
Chung Ki-Suck
Hwang Yong-Il
Oh Yeon-Mok
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Korean version of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT) and Dyspnea-12 Questionnaire for patients with bronchiectasis or tuberculous destroyed lung.

Materials and Methods: For 62 bronchiectasis patients and 37 tuberculous destroyed lung patients, 3 questionnaires including St. George¡¯s Respiratory Questionnaires (SGRQ), CAT, and Dyspnea-12 were obtained, in addition to spirometric measurements. To assess the validity of CAT and Dyspnea-12, correlation with SGRQ was evaluated. To assess the reliability of CAT and Dyspnea-12, Cronbach¡¯s ¥á coefficient was calculated.

Results: The mean ages of the patients were 60.7¡¾8.3 years in bronchiectasis and 64.4¡¾9.3 years in tuberculous destroyed lung. 46.8% and 54.1% were male, respectively. The SGRQ score was correlated with the score of the Korean version of CAT (r=0.72, p£¼0.0001) and Dyspnea-12 (r=0.67, p£¼0.0001) in bronchiectasis patients. The SGRQ score was correlated with the score of CAT (r=0.86, p£¼0.0001) and Dyspnea-12 (r=0.80, p£¼0.0001) in tuberculous destroyed lung patients. The Cronbach¡¯s ¥á coefficient for the CAT and Dyspnea-12 were 0.84 and 0.90 in bronchiectasis, and 0.88 and 0.94 in tuberculous destroyed lung, respectively.

Conclusion: We found that Korean version of CAT and Dyspnea-12 are valid and reliable in patients with tuberculous destroyed lung and bronchiectasis.
KEYWORD
Dyspnea, Severity of Illness Index, Questionnaires, Validation Studies, Bronchiectasis, Tuberculosis
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø